League Cookies Policy
X

We use cookies to give you the best experience of our site. By using this site or by dismissing this banner you are consenting to their use.
Find out how to manage cookies and change your settings.

We work to expose and end the cruelty inflicted on animals for sport.

Wildlife Crimewatch Line: 01483 361 108

Home Blog Blog

League Against Cruel Sports

The League Against Cruel Sports' blog is updated daily so you can keep informed about our campaign news, activities and progress.

Our bloggers

Christina
Katy
Joe
IanP
IanB

The Hunting Act has never been so at risk

Written by Joe on 08 February, 2013 : 16:45

On Boxing Day, Owen Patterson, the Conservative Government Minister, stated that there would not be a vote to repeal the Hunting Act in 2013. He admitted this was because they knew they would lose. This worried me greatly. Others seemed really pleased, punching the air in triumph.

It gives me no pleasure to say I told you so.

In a recent interview Patterson confirmed my worst fears. Hunting lobbyists, pro hunt MP's, with the active encouragement of a Government Minister and the Prime Minister, are ramping up their behind the scenes campaigning with the aim of winning a vote to repeal the Hunting Act.

This is a very dangerous time. All this will go on behind closed doors. In the corridors, tearooms and bars of the House of Commons, MP’s will be nobbled by the pro-hunt lobby. Every tactic in the book will be used to persuade, encourage and possibly coerce MP’s to change their mind. If they are anti-hunt they will be “encouraged” to sit on their hands or not turn up for a vote. If they have not made their mind up yet, they will be “persuaded” to vote for repeal of the Act.

In the constituencies of these targeted MP’s, organisations like the Countryside Alliance will be trying to put pressure on MP’s to declare in their favour.

Whilst alarming, this isn’t a time for panic, but, neither is it a time for complacency.
Everything is on our side as long as we don’t sit back and leave the goal open to this vociferous minority.

 Don’t forget
• The majority of the public doesn’t want to see hunting with dogs legal again
• The majority of MP’s still support us – if a vote was called today, we would win
• A lot of high profile individuals support us
• Hunters’ arguments are weak and ours strong
• History and time is on our side; in the next few weeks it will be the 8th anniversary of the Hunting Act
• The Act works. There have been more prosecutions and a higher conviction rate than other wildlife legislation
• We have even more prosecutions of hunters in the pipeline

And don’t forget, the League is stronger than ever. Just as they will be active in Parliament, so will we. But mostly, what the hunters don’t like is a spotlight shining on their shenanigans. Whether it’s illegal hunting, arm twisting MP’s, promoting their pompous propaganda or lobbying government behind the scenes, together we will be there fighting for our wildlife. And we are not alone. Working with our supporters and with sister organisations, like the RSPCA, IFAW and POWA, we will Keep Cruelty History.

5 comments

john parkin
Foxes arent the only casualties of this so called sport.........On wed feb 6th, the sth durham hunt rode in close proximuty of my land, our 14.2 pony became extremely agitated with the result he spooked and bolted. Several hrs later we were fortunate thanks to social networking locate him after hrs of searching the locale to no avail. Due to exhaustion, trauma and excessive stress due solely to the actions of the Hunt that day, he died during the early hours of fri feb 8th. He has been with the family over 15yrs. As you may appreciate we are devasted. His loss was avoidable, No Hunt, no issue of him bolting.
Toxic
How can it be that all of a sudden the media start to highlight fox attacks? Duh... cash from corporate lobby groups and toffs as one poster said here http://articlechase.com/beyondnews/thread-3622.html I totally agree.
K WATSON
Let us hope that the latest "nasty fox" horror story does not produce a panic. Far more babies have been killed or injured by dogs not properly handled, and the food supply could be better controlled to discourage urban foxes with opportunist feeding habits (but preying on harmful insects, rodents and birds such as pigeons). What about the hounds that fatally frightened Mr. Parkin's pony - one sound reason fro only allowing controlled registered drag hunting?
Patricia Betty
Throughout history, individuals or groups of people have advocated greater kindness and denounced cruelty, but what had never been suggested was that cruelty should actually be banned by law. It was left to a great English philosopher, Jeremy Bentham, to put forward such an idea in 1780. Twenty years later, a courageous MP called William Pulteney tried to bring in a Bill to prevent bull-baiting. It was thrown out and he was ridiculed and reviled for his ideas. Throughout Britain, men of sensitivity and kindness saw themselves surrounded by a society which permitted slavery, cruelty to children, and which amused itself by torturing animals. Those men didn’t give up and neither will we. Managing change is a painfully slow progress and the change facilitators have to be prepared for setbacks, dirty tricks, threats, lies and smear tactics from the opposition, just as Pulteney et al had to endure all those years ago.
Eric Prior
Farmers tell me that newly born carves in the fields are often attacked by faxes, They apparantly, eat all the flesh off the tail, just leaving the bare tail bone. They also say that the ears are bitten off. All this with the baby calf alive Therefore do foxes do damage and should they be controlled?

Add a comment

Name:
Email:
Comment: