League Cookies Policy
X

We use cookies to give you the best experience of our site. By using this site or by dismissing this banner you are consenting to their use.
Find out how to manage cookies and change your settings.

We work to expose and end the cruelty inflicted on animals for sport.

Wildlife Crimewatch Line: 01483 361 108

Home Blog Blog

League Against Cruel Sports

The League Against Cruel Sports' blog is updated daily so you can keep informed about our campaign news, activities and progress.

Our bloggers

Christina
Katy
Joe
IanP
IanB

"Your Freedom" website goes live

Written by on 01 July, 2010 : 07:54

It won't take long - it could happen before I finish typing this blog entry - for someone to add the Hunting Act to the government's new Your Freedom website through which members of the public can air gripes about legislation and put the case forward for repeal of unpopular laws.

And so when the hunters pile in, as they inevitably will, it's worth remembering two things.

Firstly, when they claim that the Hunting Act is a breach of their human rights and civil liberties, remember that the High Court, the Court of Appeal, the House of Lords and the European Court of Human Rights dismissed the hunters' claim to that effect. There is, very clearly, no human right or civil liberty to be cruel.

Second, there is absolutely no public mandate for repeal. Polls by Ipsos-MORI and YouGov consistently show that a significant majority of the public support the ban on hunting. It is only the bloodthirsty minority who want to see it repealed. A government that ignores the general will of the people on an emotive issue such as this is a government out of touch.

And finally, something to think about. If the hunters want the Hunting Act repealed because it makes their bloodsport a crime, why don't we get some burglars to suggest repeal of the Theft Act, or some rapists to suggest repeal of the Sexual Offences Act? Same argument, after all...

7 comments

Bonnie
The "Your Freedom" website seems wrong somehow because it only tells one side of the story! What if someone wants to KEEP an act or bill what do they do? Their wording of "REPEALING UNNECESSARY LAWS does not appear to allow people to vote for keeping the law! Surely this voting system is biased! I am deeply concerned about this.
adrian stallwood
it's already up and the hunters are indeed piling in.this whole exercise is ridiculous, like law-making by children in a balloon debate. what a way to run a country.
Linda Crossley
I went on to Your Freedom website to add support for Strengthen the Hunting Ban post and could not add my support too busy it said Bye the way what sort of goverment is this, what are they up to now using pyschology on the british public to get the public to their way of thinking.I know...................... Let the british public decide if we want to tax the rich lots lots more thats a good freedom idea I think! And also another idea, if we are going to have freedom,let's say that all working mans wages should be fairer and not such a huge gap in saleries so the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor Let the public decide on that,and NOT whether to Repeal the Hunting Act Leave the Animals ALONE blood thirsty Conservatives
Michael
I've just complained to the BBC re their half-hour fox-ate-my-baby special. When the ban came in, country alliance people said they would fill in fox holes and drive foxes into urban areas to help get the ban overturned. I remember it at the time. Some said "Wait till we have the Tories back." Now we do, and within a couple of weeks the press are featuring stories of foxes eating babies. Why aren't we getting the message across re what's really happening here? Is anyone looking for evidence of what the hunting lobby are doing? Surely this could show them up for the amoral scum they are.
Lorna
I'd have thought the parents would be more concerned about caring for the two babies than being involved so much with the media. Regarding the 'Your Freedom' website - Despite several attempts I wasn't able to view any of the discussions as the pages wouldn't load properly.
M Stoneman
The ' DECLARATION ' not to obey the law to ban hunting was signed by (according to hunt suppoters) thousands of people , It's never mentioned now but I am very interested to know whether the new Minister for Policing and Justice, Nick Herbert, was a signatory? (he was not an MP at the time ) When I wrote to his office and asked, the reply was to direct any questions to my own MP, which I did ...who's answer was that he personaly did not hunt but respects the freedom of others to do so. Has the DECLARATION worked? if so should we formulate our own?
M Stoneman
Did the Minister for Policing and Justice...Nick Herbert....sign the DECLARATION not to obey the Law if the then Government brought in the Hunting Act? he was not an MP at the time. The reply from his office to me when I put the question was to write to my own MP who answered that he personally did not hunt but respected the freedom of others to do so.

Add a comment

Name:
Email:
Comment: