League Cookies Policy
X

We use cookies to give you the best experience of our site. By using this site or by dismissing this banner you are consenting to their use.
Find out how to manage cookies and change your settings.

We work to expose and end the cruelty inflicted on animals in the name of sport.

Wildlife Crimewatch Line: 01483 361 108

Home Blog Blog

League Against Cruel Sports

The League Against Cruel Sports' blog is updated daily so you can keep informed about our campaign news, activities and progress.

Our bloggers

Christina
Katy
Joe
IanP
IanB

Badger cull licences could cost £1.4m

Written by on 18 November, 2011 : 09:00

The Minister responsible for overseeing the introduction of a badger cull in England has now revealed that the cost of this to farmers and landowners, who will be paying for it, could be £1.4million. Jim Paice MP announced that these costs involve all those associated with actually carrying out the cull, including the administration of the licences and surveys that will be needed.

The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has calculated that this will be the cost to farmers and landowners within each 350sq km cull zone, but yet they still seem to think this will be value for money. However, coming from a department that has just spent £70million on redundancy payments to its staff despite the on-going recruitment of 500 new members of staff, we shouldn’t really be surprised.

One thing these costs don’t include however is the cost of policing and enforcing the cull. This question has been posed to Ministers several times but it appears the final figure has not been decided, or at least released, by the Home Office.

There are serious worries about the policing arrangements surrounding the proposed culling trial, not only from those that will inevitably try and stop it taking place, but also as a result of the high costs. I am not saying that the costs should be lowered as actually I don’t think the cull should take place at all, but do Ministers seriously not expect illegal culling to be rife given the costs associated with doing it legally?

The whole situation smacks of a department and set of ministers so desperate not to lose face over yet another policy shambles that they are holding on for dear life despite the complete mess they are leaving the countryside in. Let us be clear, these trials are piling over a million pounds of debt onto an already struggling industry with the false hope that this will improve their livelihoods. The science is clear that culling does not remove the problem of bovineTB and can actually make the whole situation much worse.

Things have got so desperate for Jim Paice that he now seemingly cannot even answer the most simple of questions. When asked by Huw Irranca-Davies MP if the Secretary of State, Caroline Spelman has discussed this issue with the Prime Minister, he responded with:

 “The Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, my right hon. Friend the Member for Meriden (Mrs Spelman), discusses a range of issues with the Prime Minister on a regular basis.”

Well I’m glad he cleared that one up then.

5 comments

K WATSON
I quite agree - this is a horrendous waste of money on a problem that is nowhere near the magnitude claimed if ir exists at all. What about "inspected" factory farms with animals existing in appalling squalid conditons - ought the health and safety fanatics not to turn their attention to this disgrace, particularly in view of the tendency to gigantic industrial-type dairy units?
Matthew
To spend £1.4m to tackle a problem that in 09-10 cost the tax payer £87m (http://www.bovinetb.info). Yes that does not sound like a good use of money at all. If LACS are really committed to helping badgers why are they not saying they will mobilize their campaigners to vaccinate the badger population, as opposed to just shouting from the sidelines.
Joshua (League Against Cruel Sports)
Matthew, spending £1.4 million to solve an £87 million problem of course teoretically is good economics, but the fact is that the science is clear that this will not remove the problem of bovineTB. This is simply further burdening farmers and giving them false hope. Our staff on our sanctuaries have just been trained into vaccinating badgers and we are now undertaking a feasability study to look at undertaking vaccination on our land. We are absolutely committed to doing more than just 'shouting from the sidelines'.
eddie
Just out of interest joshua,how do you intend to administer vaccination?
Matthew
Joshua vaccinating on your own land is just the sort of shouting from the sidelines I was referring to. Why are you not grabbing national headlines by volunteering to mobilize all your supporters, as apposed to staff, to carry out a notional programme. Maybe you already know that the problem is too big for you to tackle. A well organized cull followed by a programmed vaccination in my opinion is the way forward.

Add a comment

Name:
Email:
Comment: